BASH! UE errata

Post by **BASHMAN** » Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:04 pm

drkrash wrote:In the Brawler Archetype, shouldn't the one-two punch cost 2 points, not 1?

You are correct, thanks for spotting that.

AslanC · Post by **AslanC** » Thu Aug 19, 2010 3:55 pm

Super-ior wrote:I am new to the world outside of the blockbuster RPGs and I don't know if anybody does this already, or even if that is doable from a logistics point of view, but I think it would be a huge boost to the PDF RPG market if people who bought the PDF could receive (if they are interested) a new version with all the errata included in the original text instead of in a bunch of separated PDFs.

It all depends on hard it is to update the current PDF, some companies are able to do it due to an easily modified PDF.

BASHMAN?

Post by **BASHMAN** » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:58 pm

Page 96, the chart for the "Space" enhancement. Where it says "Roll" it should say "Level" and where it says "Event Type" it should say "Speed per Panel".

Post by **BASHMAN** » Sat Oct 30, 2010 4:01 am

Super-ior wrote:The name of the martial art Capoeira is misspelled in the book.

I am new to the world outside of the blockbuster RPGs and I don't know if anybody does this already, or even if that is doable from a logistics point of view, but I think it would be a huge boost to the PDF RPG market if people who bought the PDF could receive (if they are interested) a new version with all the errata included in the original text instead of in a bunch of separated PDFs.

That is the plan for the reprint. But I need to collect more Erratta ASAP to do that!

Post by **BASHMAN** » Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:41 pm

Under “Super Vehicle”
Remove the sentence “You are allowed to take this Advantage multiple times to have multiple Super Vehicles.” Replace it with:
“You can spend 2 of the Vehicle’s Character Points to have an additional Super Vehicle of equal or lesser points. You can have several Super Vehicles this way.”

Post by **BASHMAN** » Fri Nov 05, 2010 12:07 am

Page 45
Under “Immobilization” change the last two sentences from “The diffculty of the Brawn check to break free is 10/point you spend on the strength of this power. You can spend points to increase the range, Burst, or chance to hit with this power as per Special Attack.” To instead read:
“The diffculty of the Brawn check to break free is 10/point you spend on the strength of this power (to a maximum of 30). You may also use levels to increase your multiplier to Hit. “

MrJupiter · Post by **MrJupiter** » Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:23 am

I often wonder if option B for Devestating Weakness (on page 5) wasn't just a little overhanded.

Option A - character takes tripple damage.
Option B - Character becomes a 'normal' by losing powers AND takes tripple damage.

Maybe option B could be reduced to taking just double damage as well as losing powers and high stats.

urbwar · Post by **urbwar** » Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:40 pm

As a slight tangent: Besides updating the pdf, will an errata file be available as well for those of us with older print copies?

MrJupiter · Post by **MrJupiter** » Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:51 pm

Oh yes, good call. I'd like seeing an officially compiled errata fie myself!

Boost · Post by **Boost** » Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:37 pm

MrJupiter wrote:I often wonder if option B for Devestating Weakness (on page 5) wasn't just a little overhanded.

Option A - character takes tripple damage.
Option B - Character becomes a 'normal' by losing powers AND takes tripple damage.

Maybe option B could be reduced to taking just double damage as well as losing powers and high stats.

I used to think that way, but I thought both referred to a form of attack, where as Option B is just an Aura, made a difference to me, may not to you.

Post by **BASHMAN** » Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:16 pm

MrJupiter wrote:I often wonder if option B for Devestating Weakness (on page 5) wasn't just a little overhanded.

Option A - character takes tripple damage.
Option B - Character becomes a 'normal' by losing powers AND takes tripple damage.

Maybe option B could be reduced to taking just double damage as well as losing powers and high stats.

You arw misreading option B. You don't take triple damage. You take 2d6x3 dmg.

MrJupiter · Post by **MrJupiter** » Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:47 pm

BASHMAN wrote:
MrJupiter wrote:I often wonder if option B for Devestating Weakness (on page 5) wasn't just a little overhanded.

Option A - character takes tripple damage.
Option B - Character becomes a 'normal' by losing powers AND takes tripple damage.

Maybe option B could be reduced to taking just double damage as well as losing powers and high stats.
You arw misreading option B. You don't take triple damage. You take 2d6x3 dmg.

Ahhh. That makes more sense to me. Thanks Bashman!

Gobbo · Post by **Gobbo** » Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:09 pm

The Example on page 16 states:

Example: David knows he needs a Superhuman result with his x4 Multiplier. Looking down the x4 column, he sees the first yellow box says “32”, looks left and knows he needs to roll an 8 to succeed. He also knows that if he only rolls a 7, it will take 4 Hero Points to make up the difference.

Shouldn't he only need 2 Hero points? Since a roll of 7 only gives him a 28, and Table 2-1 says you need a 30?

28 +2 is 30...

Post by **BASHMAN** » Fri Feb 04, 2011 1:29 pm

Gobbo wrote:The Example on page 16 states:
Example: David knows he needs a Superhuman result with his x4 Multiplier. Looking down the x4 column, he sees the first yellow box says “32”, looks left and knows he needs to roll an 8 to succeed. He also knows that if he only rolls a 7, it will take 4 Hero Points to make up the difference.
Shouldn't he only need 2 Hero points? Since a roll of 7 only gives him a 28, and Table 2-1 says you need a 30?

28 +2 is 30...

You are right! Thanks for catching that!

Gobbo · Post by **Gobbo** » Fri Feb 04, 2011 1:32 pm

Woo hoo! New guy nails one!