Just to be clear, my x then y list wasn't intended to be my actions declaration to the Narrator, which is why it isn't in the IC thread. It was targeted to the other players, saying what role I was looking to fill this round so we could get a plan going. I was hoping it would help prompt some similar posts from everyone so we could start building a plan for the round. I clearly didn't do as good a job as I hoped though...AslanC wrote:Okay can everyone let me know what your actions are. Please don't do the "I will do this unless x and then y." Just take your panels or hammer our some team work here first
I haven't really played any play-by-posts so I feel a little confused about how this should work. I'm used to the table top (or at least synchronous) structure where the guy with highest priority goes first and his actions are resolved before the next guy goes. It feels odd and confusing for me to announce my actions for Priority 10 when there is a very good chance that the guys going at 80 or 70 or 60 could finish off the target I declared my attack against.
AslanC, everything below this point is just a question/suggestion, so feel free to say no.
Can we set down some guidelines for how a page will work in the play by post game? Do you want us to all declare our actions first (in priority order?) and you then do one massive resolution at the end? That is kind of what happened in the surprise round, so is that the way it should work? Or does one of us post, you resolve it, the next one posts, you resolve that, etc. all in priority order like a face-to-face game? In either case are we waiting for the people to post in priority order?
Should we house rule how priority works here for the play-by-post format? I don't have a definitive suggestion, but I do have a few random ideas for alternate approaches, and others might have better ideas.
The first possibility would be to keep priority as normal, but have a "table rule" that you have 1 day (or maybe 2 days, but I'm good with 1) to post when it is your turn. If you haven't posted, the next person can go. As soon as the bypassed player is available, he can interrupt and take his action but it occurs at that point and can't invalidate anything that has been posted in the interim.
Another possibility would be to take a page from the old Torg game, and decide whether heroes or villains go first based on whether it is a "dramatic" or "standard" encounter. In a standard encounter, the heroes go first, villains come after. In a dramatic encounter, when you're facing off against the big bad or his lieutenants, etc. then the villains go first and the heroes go last. Either way, when it is the heroes turn, we just go in order of whoever posts first. That streamlines things and avoids unnecessary waiting for the "right person" (whoever is next on the priority list) to post. To compensate the people with high priority multipliers, maybe they get +1 hero point per multiplier over the slowest hero, or something like that.
In either case, once a player posts his action the Narrator can resolve it when convenient. The next player(s) can post their actions if they aren't dependent on the outcome of the first player, or they can wait until the Narrator resolves the first action if its outcome may be important to their plans.
Any thoughts? Am I the only one lost?