Enhancements/Limitations on LINKED powers
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2011 3:52 pm
With LINKED powers, are Enhancements and/or Limitations added individually to each power - therefor costing the Enhancement pts or giving the Limitation pts for EACH Linked power?
OR
When building a Linked power group - do you *pay* only ONCE for an Enhancement and/or Limitation, with that Enhancement/Limitation effecting BOTH/all powers Linked? Making it so that there is no way to Enhance or Limit one of the powers in a Linked set then?
The core rules do not say specifically. However, they DO say that Linked is "similar" to multi-power. And multi-power notes: "Any power enhancements or limitations must be added to each individual power."
Further... I ask because Linked also notes that if one power in the link has range, or Burst effect, BOTH must have this effect. [emphasis mine]
So.... like Enhancements/Limitations, would you pay for the Range/Area each individually or only once for the Linked set of powers?
The language of the rules all leads me to think that you pay for each under Linked individually. But I'm not sure if that's inline with the spirit of the rule cost-break...
thanks
-kev-
OR
When building a Linked power group - do you *pay* only ONCE for an Enhancement and/or Limitation, with that Enhancement/Limitation effecting BOTH/all powers Linked? Making it so that there is no way to Enhance or Limit one of the powers in a Linked set then?
The core rules do not say specifically. However, they DO say that Linked is "similar" to multi-power. And multi-power notes: "Any power enhancements or limitations must be added to each individual power."
Further... I ask because Linked also notes that if one power in the link has range, or Burst effect, BOTH must have this effect. [emphasis mine]
So.... like Enhancements/Limitations, would you pay for the Range/Area each individually or only once for the Linked set of powers?
The language of the rules all leads me to think that you pay for each under Linked individually. But I'm not sure if that's inline with the spirit of the rule cost-break...
thanks
-kev-