I'm sorry for so many questions about the details over the past week or two. I'm having a hard time with the Enhancements and Limitations. It feels like a lot got cut or left out before printing... or I'm just not getting it.
Taking this first, 'cause it's important!
No apologies!!! Questions are always good, and that's what this forum is here for.
-HF-Aardvark892 wrote:-I don't think that's how it works, though. I believe you still have to buy points in enhancements to get any benefit from them, even if the descriptor is free according to the power-
Definitely! I didn't mean that at all. You're right about that.
What I meant is this:
People have gotten into two habits when it comes to writing down powers in a build. Some people like notation 1, and some people like notation 2, and some people use them both depending on what came to mind first.
Let's have an example: I want to buy a Special Attack with +2 DM, +1 attack, usable in a Medium Burst. We all agree that costs 5 points: 2 for DM, 1 for attack, 2 for Medium Burst.
My personal preference for writing that down is:
Special Attack 3: +1 attack, +2 DM, Medium Burst (5 pts)
However, when you are reading the forums (and a few of the archetypes in the Bash book), it is just as likely that you will see something like this:
Special Attack 5: +1 attack, +2 DM, Burst 2 (5 pts)
We all agree that the power costs 5 points, whichever way we write it down. It just comes down to personal preference whether points spent on area and range get included in the number next to the power name, or not.
I'd make the argument that it is better not to include area and range in the number next to the power name, for one reason. Let's say I wanted this power instead: +5 DM, Long Range, Small Burst (5+3+1= 9 pts). I would write it like this:
Special Attack 5: +5 DM, Long Range, Small Burst (9 pts)
The other option is:
Special Attack 9: +5 DM, Long Range, Small Burst (9 pts)
The problem with that second one is that you are limited to 5 ranks of Special Attack (ie, 5 ranks of attack and/or damage bonus), but you can have as many extra points in range and area as you want. The person is only buying +5 DM, so it is really is legal, but someone reading that description may get confused on a quick glance about how he can have "Special Attack 9".
So the first option seems "better" to me, while the second option seems more likely to cause confusion. But at the end of the day, it really is just a notation that people use to summarize the power. As long as it doesn't affect the price or the benefits, the only real problem is the confusion caused by two different styles of notation.