Legal Issues? from Fabrica to name referencing
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2011 5:12 pm
I've asked various forums in various ways... and I still never get a solid answer. Nothing that leads me to any specific point that says "you cannot do *this*".
Does anyone have any suggestions, know any lawyers, have better search-fu than me, etc... To find answers.
For example...
#1. We see AslanC's new product ( http://bashtalk.org/modules.php?name=Fo ... opic&t=711 ) uses the Fabrica image generator for illustration. And AslanC notes he couldn't find any legal deterents and that other products (cite?) use Hero Machine for imagery.
#2. In the new ICONS "Field Guide to Superheroes" we see "Examples" clearly listed under each archetype noting examples of famous Marvel/DC and other publication characters.
I would love love, kill to know for certain, love to have a locked in stone definition of how/why we (as publishers, 3rd party or otherwise) can or cannot use names of published characters (like Spiderman/Superman), names of movies or comic book stories/collections, or imagery of the icons or cover art from those references and NOT be subject to legal issues. And also do so in the best fair use, morally.
Secondly... the use of images created from public/private image generators - to be published in our works.
Does anyone have any solid ideas on this (speculation is fine, but it really needs backed-up)...
Another thought. Would anyone be interested in actually calling/contacting lawyers to learn these questions? I'm not sure if this would or could be a "free consultation" type thing or if there'd be a cost for the advice. And if so, what would that cost be? And if low enough, would anyone be interested in sharing that cost to find out 100% legal precedent with reference from the lawyer (in case someone asks).
My reason for asking.
I have several ideas that WANT to use reference to published characters or works, not to mention the ability to use the various image generators for quick/cheap imagery fillers. My ideas are NOT using the original references to "sell" my product ideas, rather to give reference to make it "click". ICON's Field Guides are the perfect example, showing that *this* archetype is similar to:
Heck. I don't even know what type of LAW this would be categorized under. Anyone?
Thoughts?
-kev-
Does anyone have any suggestions, know any lawyers, have better search-fu than me, etc... To find answers.
For example...
#1. We see AslanC's new product ( http://bashtalk.org/modules.php?name=Fo ... opic&t=711 ) uses the Fabrica image generator for illustration. And AslanC notes he couldn't find any legal deterents and that other products (cite?) use Hero Machine for imagery.
#2. In the new ICONS "Field Guide to Superheroes" we see "Examples" clearly listed under each archetype noting examples of famous Marvel/DC and other publication characters.
I would love love, kill to know for certain, love to have a locked in stone definition of how/why we (as publishers, 3rd party or otherwise) can or cannot use names of published characters (like Spiderman/Superman), names of movies or comic book stories/collections, or imagery of the icons or cover art from those references and NOT be subject to legal issues. And also do so in the best fair use, morally.
Secondly... the use of images created from public/private image generators - to be published in our works.
Does anyone have any solid ideas on this (speculation is fine, but it really needs backed-up)...
Another thought. Would anyone be interested in actually calling/contacting lawyers to learn these questions? I'm not sure if this would or could be a "free consultation" type thing or if there'd be a cost for the advice. And if so, what would that cost be? And if low enough, would anyone be interested in sharing that cost to find out 100% legal precedent with reference from the lawyer (in case someone asks).
My reason for asking.
I have several ideas that WANT to use reference to published characters or works, not to mention the ability to use the various image generators for quick/cheap imagery fillers. My ideas are NOT using the original references to "sell" my product ideas, rather to give reference to make it "click". ICON's Field Guides are the perfect example, showing that *this* archetype is similar to:
DESCENDANT
Examples: Wally West - the Flash, Kyle Rayner - the Green Lantern, Rick Tyler - Hourman, Dan Drieberg - Nite Owl, The Phantom, Jack Knight - Starman.
Heck. I don't even know what type of LAW this would be categorized under. Anyone?
Thoughts?
-kev-